Experiment in the desert

Masdar, a new ambitious city plan funded by an oil rich Abu Dhabi government is currently underway in the UAE. Their goal is to build a city ground up that will house ~47 000 people, have no carbon emissions, no cars, and no waste by 2015. Combining the brightest researchers, scientists and technology they have planned what the sustainable city of the future should be.

The ideas in the initiative a refreshing way to re-create the cityscape. I would love to live in a place with no cars. Just think  the decrease in stress and accidents if no one had to drive. As great as this new Carbon Zero city sounds, we have to remember things work differently in reality. This environmentally utopian city really isn't dealing with our current problems of existing infrastructure. It's ignoring a massive problem our generation needs to face: the millions of people already living in suburbs. 

Masdar initiative has an immense budget to work with. By building everything from scratch with a virtually unlimited budget (so it seems) relieves the designers of a huge restriction. It gives them freedom to implement all the ideas they have. Rarely does this ever happen in reality. Masdar may be environmentally sustainable, but is it sustainable socially and economically? I mean how many countries can build a city ground up when they aren't happy with they existing ones? So many new materials are being used to create this city, are they ALL made from recycled materials? When they say Carbon Zero do they take into consideration all the energy and resources needed to build Masdar in the first place? In a bigger sense this reminds me of the disposable mentality we have today, that when we don't like something or get bored of it we just buy a new one.  Building a city from ground up isn't solving the problems of current infrastructure. By building a walled city where only those who can afford it is gentrification and creating large social divides. The situation to me seems like rich people get to enjoy clean air and the freedom from environmental guilt, while the poor remain in the polluted, decaying cities.  

Land is such a precious resource, the answer is not to use more of it. I think we need to work with what we already have. Instead using more land we should stop building and figure out ways to maximize land with boundaries already set. 

Masdar is a great and interesting experiment. It's also great that people are trying to be new and innovate about the ways we go about building our cities. But I feel (for now) this is all it ever will be, an experiment that includes 47 000 wealthy people. We've already invested so much in our current cities, how can we afford to build new cities? I think Masdar should be taken as an incredible experiment from which we can learn from, but to create all new cities like this seems somewhat unrealistic.

Reflections for October 30 Class

The two guest speakers that came to speak in this week's class brought to the table a wide spectrum of knowledge about the design world. Our first speaker was a hard hitting, to-the-point engineering consultant from Stantec Architects. Through a riveting 100+ slides he walked us through various skills like excel and public engagement that is crucial to our future professions, many of these skills not taught in our current schooling. There was also mention about the triple bottom line, and how to mitigate risks when dealing with the uncertainties of the real world. A six step sure fire procedure to maximize success and minimize risk was shown to us, a procedure that can translate into anything you work at in life. 

The second speaker came to our class with a entire different set of information. Dr. David van Vliet provided several case studies of successful planning projects in different Scandinavian countries. These countries seemed to be far ahead of North America in terms of the amount of thought put into the layout of their cities. There are also exhibitions held throughout different cities to promote good design practices in dealing with city growth, something Winnipeg could definitely learn from.

Both speakers had presented very interesting information to the class, but what really stands out in my mind of this week's class is the delivery of information. The contrast between Mr. Carmine Militano's presentation and Dr. David van Vliet was like day and night. Mr. Militano was much more engaging as a speaker and even though I'm not as interested in the business side of architecture (yet), I felt more interested in what he had to say versus Dr. Vliet. Now I'm not sure if Jae co-ordinated that deliberately, but asides from learning about the business side of design and planning, I learned what a difference the delivery of information can make. If we are to really implement our innovative ideas into the real world, we'll have to acquire the ability to convince businesses, developers, government and the public.